Skip to content
Subscribe

Apple vs FBI: New Survey Shows FBI Losing Public Battle over Unlocking iPhone

Apple vs FBI: New Survey Shows FBI Losing Public Battle over Unlocking iPhone
Published:

WASHINGTON, March 22, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- As the FBI signals it may try to avert a court showdown with Apple over whether the tech company should be required to help unlock the iPhone of a shooter who killed 14 people in the San Bernardino attack, a new survey indicates that Apple is winning the fierce public battle.

According to a Vrge Analytics survey of 657 people, more Americans believe that Apple has made a more compelling case that it shouldn't be required to help unlock the phone to determine if the shooter was tied to extremist Islamic groups.

According to the survey, 42 percent of Americans said Apple had made the more compelling case while only 30 percent said that the FBI had done so. 19 percent said they hadn't made up their mind while 9 percent were not sure.

There was other troubling news for the FBI.

The Vrge Analytics survey found that support for the FBI has eroded in the last month since the controversy sparked a fierce debate over what should take priority – national security needs or the right to privacy:

  • A month ago, Vrge found that 50 percent of Americans believed that Apple should be required to help unlock the iPhone. That support has now slipped to 41 percent.
  • A month ago, by a 41 percent-33 percent margin, Americans said they would trust the FBI with their own personal information. But in the follow-up poll, which was in the field March 19-20, more Americans (41 percent-37 percent) now report that they would not trust the FBI to handle their personal information in a responsible manner and not use it to harm them.
  • Americans also seemed to reverse their opinion on whether they would want Apple to help unlock their own iPhone if asked by the FBI.
  • By a 44 percent-38 percent margin, Americans now say they would want Apple to refuse to do so. Just a month ago, Americans (by a 46 percent-40 percent margin) said that they would want Apple to do as the FBI asked.

"Taken all together, this data may offer clues into why the FBI is suddenly trying to ratchet down the controversy and avert a court showdown with Apple," said Tom Galvin, partner at Vrge Strategies. "The debate over privacy versus national security is likely to persist for years, and the FBI cannot afford to lose the first round, either in the federal courts or in the court of public opinion."

Tellingly, the vast majority of Americans are clinging to the notion that privacy is an important principle - even in a digital era often defined by data breaches and unease over how easy the government and large tech companies can peek into private lives.

Two-thirds of Americans, 67 percent, said, "Of course we should still have an expectation of privacy, technology doesn't change that." That was the one polling statistic that was consistent from the February and March Vrge surveys.

Full results of the survey, which has a margin of error of 3 percent, are available upon request.

About Vrge Strategies

Based in Washington, DC, San Francisco, CA and Seattle, WA, Vrge helps startups and established companies – disruptors and the disrupted – navigate this uncharted territory by positioning them, identifying the audiences that matter most, and creating advocacy campaigns to advance their goals – whether they be legislative, regulatory, societal or business-to-business. For more information, go to www.vrge.us.

SOURCE Vrge Strategies

RELATED LINKS

http://www.vrge.us

Editor’s note: The information provided on this page is from an independent, third-party content provider. If you have any questions or comments about this page please contact editor@ivn.us.

Photo Credit: 360b / Shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Apple vs FBI: New Survey Shows FBI Losing Public Battle over Unlocking iPhone

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us