Skip to content
Subscribe

"Big Medicine" GOP Sen. on Health Care: "We Didn't Expect Trump"

"Big Medicine" GOP Sen. on Health Care: "We Didn't Expect Trump"
Published:

US Senator Pat Toomey (R-Penn.) says the reason Republicans have not been able to move forward on health care yet is because no one expected Donald Trump to win -- not him nor his Republican colleagues. So, 9 months later, Republican lawmakers still struggle with reaching consensus.

"I didn't expect Donald Trump to win. I think most of my colleagues didn't. So, we didn't expect to be in this situation, and given how difficult it is to get to a consensus, it was hard to force that until there was a need to," says Toomey.

The GOP senator envisions the ideal reform being a clean repeal that "stabilizes the market" and sets actual repeal several years down the road to give lawmakers time to work on reforms. In other words, there is no expedient path to health care reform.

But is there more to it than that? It's not unreasonable to assume people can forget all of the parties that have an invested interest in the fate of health care.

Toomey himself gets a ton of money from "Big Medicine." Look at these numbers from 2011-2016:

  • The pharmaceutical sector was the 11th largest donor to Toomey, giving him over half a million dollars.
  • The medical manufacturing and distribution sector gave him nearly the same amount, donating a total of $465,316. Toomey supports repealing Obamacare's medical device tax.
  • Health professionals collectively donated $445,153. These professionals likely have mixed feelings on the current Affordable Care Act.
  • Lobbyists representing Blue Cross/Blue Shield alone gave Toomey's re-election campaign $92,613. Blue PACs contributed $25 million in lobbying activity.

Check out an extensive list of industry donors here.

Health care reform is certainly something that won't happen overnight.

However, with so many invested parties trying to sway the future of health care policy, simply blaming the "unexpected" result of an election that happened nine months ago seems to disguise the real culprit in stalling any legislation on health care.

Why do you think it took Democrats a year and a half to build consensus around and pass the Affordable Care Act, even when they had both the legislative and executive branches? It appears to be the same story, different party.

Image: U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

"Big Medicine" GOP Sen. on Health Care: "We Didn't Expect Trump"

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us