Skip to content
Subscribe

Congress and the TSA: They're Both Terrible At Their Jobs

Congress and the TSA: They're Both Terrible At Their Jobs
Published:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg3MYqzF5VM

Most people know how it is to go through airport security in post-9/11 America. Experiences vary from person to person, but most people will say it's a hassle to say the least.

But as TSA agents confiscate the bottle of water you can just buy in the airport and take on the plane, a new report shows the agency is really bad at stopping actual threats from getting through security checkpoints.

ABC News reports that recent undercover tests show the TSA failure rate to stop dangerous weapons like knives, guns, and potentially even bombs is astonishingly high.

"In recent undercover tests of multiple airport security checkpoints by the Department of Homeland Security, inspectors said screeners, their equipment or their procedures failed more than half the time, according to a source familiar with the classified report," ABC News reports.

When asked if the failure rate was 80 percent, their source responded, "You are in the ballpark."

From ABC News:

"In a public hearing after a private classified briefing to the House Committee on Homeland Security, members of Congress called the failures by the Transportation Security Administration disturbing.

Rep. Mike Rogers went as far as to tell TSA Administrator David Pekoske, "This agency that you run is broken badly, and it needs your attention."

Here's the thing: The poor performance by the TSA is not new.

Headlines come out every year about the baffling failure rate of TSA screeners to detect legitimate threats to passengers and airline staff under these undercover tests. And every year, members of Congress bring out TSA administrators to wag a finger at them.

Yet, there are few changes to TSA policy, equipment, or practices. Passengers have the same experience going through TSA today that they had a few years ago.

And no matter how many undercover tests are carried out to determine the efficiency of the TSA, the agency is still apparently bad at doing the one thing it is tasked to do.

If there is one agency under the government's purview that embodies the current state of government dysfunction -- it's the TSA. Little accountability, ineffective leadership, nothing changes, and yet the public continues to fund it, and is forced to endure a status quo that puts their interests last.

Rep. Rogers telling a TSA administrator, "This agency that you run is broken badly, and it needs your attention," is the pot calling the kettle black. Rogers could have said that in a mirror and it would have been -- for the most part -- appropriate and true.

It shouldn't surprise anyone that the TSA is a broken agency, because they are run by a broken department that is poorly overseen by a broken, dysfunctional government.

What is Congress doing about the failures of the DHS and the TSA? Nothing significant. You would think lawmakers would be a bit more willing to take action to ensure the safety of their constituents, but a failure to take substantive action has become the status quo on Capitol Hill.

The TSA hearings where agency administrators are paraded out just to be lambasted are a great opportunity for lawmakers to grandstand, but that's the only thing that comes out of them. America deserves better.

Photo Credit: Carolina K. Smith / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Congress and the TSA: They're Both Terrible At Their Jobs

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us