Skip to content
Subscribe

Negative opinions of the Tea Party movement at an all-time high

Negative opinions of the Tea Party movement at an all-time high
Published:

A Gallup poll published this Thursday found that 47% of Americans have an unfavorable image of the Tea Party movement, the highest unfavorable rating since the fledgling movement erupted onto the national scene.

When Gallup first began tracking perceptions of the Tea Parties in March of 2010, 40% of Americans viewed them unfavorably, while 37% had a positive view. According to Gallup, those numbers remained steady until this January, when favorability started to dip from 39% to 33%, and the number of Americans with a negative view went up from 42% in January to the all-time high of 47% in late April.

Demographics with the highest percentage of Americans favoring the Tea Parties included Republicans, conservatives, men over the age of 50, and people living in the South. Democrats, liberals, women over the age of 50, and people living on America's coasts tended to have the least favorable views of the Tea Party movement. Independents-- those respondents with no party affiliation-- leaned unfavorable, with 30% favoring the Tea Parties and 43% viewing them unfavorably.

While favorable/unfavorable ratings have shifted in recent months, the number of Americans who identify as Tea Party "supporters" has held steady over the last year at 30%, indicating that those who feel they belong to the Tea Party movement and are likely to have participated in any number of its rallies and protests, have not yielded in their suppport, even as outside opinions of the Tea Party have shifted.

The public opinion shift could have any number of causes. It could simply be that after seating its first class of representatives and senators following the Republican victory in November, Tea Party energy and engagement have lost steam, allowing public opinion to stale in the absence of activity and campaigning. Americans might also be disappointed with the Tea Party's record so far, for instance, because more GOP freshman congressmen voted to renew the Patriot Act than incumbent Republicans.

Meanwhile, Tea Party-backed lawmakers like Allen West and Marco Rubio have vocally pursued an aggressive foreign policy that might remind more Americans of Bush (and Obama) than it does Jefferson. It could also be that a Republican-led charge to reform entitlements and cut their budgets might also have left many Americans aggravated at the Tea Party movement, especially demographics that are concerned or confused about how these reforms will affect them.

The USA Today/Gallup poll was conducted from April 20-23 with a sample of over 1000 adults living in all 50 U.S. states, using both cellular and landline phones, with a sampling error of plus or minus 4 percent.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Negative opinions of the Tea Party movement at an all-time high

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us