Skip to content
Subscribe

Philadelphia saves $2 million by not prosecuting pot possession

Philadelphia saves $2 million by not prosecuting pot possession
Published:

This time last year, we reported on the success of drug decriminalization in Portugal ten years earlier. But if there's any doubt that decriminalization would be as effective here in America, look no further than the more recent success of Philadelphia, which effectively decriminalized marijuana possession in small amounts last June. One year later, Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams estimates the city has saved $2 million.

When not only marijuana, but all drugs, were decriminalized in Portugal a decade ago, "there were warnings the policy would be disastrous and that the country would become a European haven for drugs tourism." Everyone's worst fears turned out in the end to be unfounded. As we reported last year, after a decade of drug decriminalization, none of the dire predictions came to pass:

"Portugal has not only managed to avoid becoming a festering, unsavory  trainwreck of rampant drug addiction and ruined lives- its drug  situation has actually improved.  By all indications, the country has  more positive statistics on drug use than any other in the Eurozone as  well as compared to the United States."

But would the experiment in drug decriminalization have the same results in the United States, with a larger population, more dense urban areas, and a different culture, history, and geographic orientation? Philadelphia's year-long experiment in marijuana decriminalization could be one indication that the answer is yes. Last June, the city effectively decriminalized marijuana with the SAM (Small Amount of Marijuana) program, which turned possession of 30 grams of the plant, or less, into a summary offense instead of a misdemeanor.

Before the SAM program, Philadelphia spent thousands of dollars prosecuting each case of $10 or $15 worth of marijuana in someone's pocket. Taxpayers were footing the bill for trials, judges, court-appointed defense attorneys, prosecutors, lab tests to confirm that the seized plant was in fact marijuana, and overtime pay for testifying police officers. Now, offenders simply pay a $200 fee to attend a 3-hour class on the dangers of drug abuse, and their record is expunged. DA Williams said "We were spending thousands of dollars for when someone possessed $10 or $15 worth of weed. It just didn't make sense," estimating that 12 months of decriminalization has saved the city $2 million.

But has Philadelphia become a haven for crime, marijuana use, or drug tourism? It looks like the answer is no. Philadelphia police have told the Philadelphia Daily News "that there has been no noticeable impact on the quality of life in Philadelphia since the program went into effect." Marijuana prohibition isn't merely expensive, all evidence seems to indicate that it doesn't keep our streets any safer either, or help reduce the harm that comes from drug abuse. DA Williams, echoed a line that we are starting to hear more and more from experts, politicians, and even people like Williams who work in the criminal justice system:

"I can put someone in jail for 90 days because they possess crack. But if  we don't get them the help they need for their addiction, when they get  out of jail, they're just going to be a 90-day-older crack addict. We have to treat drug addiction as a public-health problem,  not just a criminal-justice problem."

As the Philadelphia Daily News says, Seth Williams just "gets it."

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Philadelphia saves $2 million by not prosecuting pot possession

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us