Skip to content
Subscribe

Pink Wave vs Independents

Pink Wave vs Independents
Published:

It's been called The Year of the Woman, the apex of the #metoo movement, and the height of #timesup. And the sheer number of female candidates running for Congress is commonly referred to as the ‘pink wave'. But as it turns out, the ‘pink wave’ is actually a shade of deep blue.

Just take a look at the playing field we face in the run-up to November. According to the latest numbers 2,634 people are running for US Congress in 2018 and females comprise 23 percent of all nonincumbents. If we break it down by party, the numbers are astonishingly lopsided; 80 percent of those women are Democrats. While women in blue enjoy broad support from their party, their sisters in red have secured only 13 percent of the entire GOP congressional candidate field and that is the most since 1989.

Meanwhile, female independent candidates are building a robust alliance and gaining momentum, particularly at the state level.  Instead of pushing for membership in a 'pink wave' they're smartly learning to use the color green, in the form of dollars, to build a movement. And they're doing it while sticking to their principles.

Must Bring Cash

In Vermont, when State Representative Laura Sibilia first hit the campaign trail as a newbie in 2014 she was running against an eight-year incumbent who, she felt, prioritized special interest issues over constituents.

“I have a fair amount of moxie and willfulness and am always up for a challenge,” she says. But she does not cover up her distaste for fundraising. It’s a beast.  “My god I hate that so much. I hate it, hate it, hate it."

As a former Executive Director of the Mount Snow Valley Chamber of Commerce and with a heavy involvement in regional economic development, she had professional connections and a sterling reputation.

“But I was not taking any special interest money because the incumbent opponent, he was working really hard on the issues that special interests were paying him to focus on.” Lo and behold when she announced her candidacy, competing industry groups began to quietly mail her checks.  They had no idea what she intended to do next.

“So, I’d snap a shot of the check with a friendly little note on it “Sorry I'm not taking any of these funds, but I look forward to working with you!” And posted it on social media…it caused some waves.”

Financial support came from a few former colleagues on the Chamber of Commerce board, her boss provided some support, on top of that her family chipped in 50’s and 100’s and she put in a little of her own. Sibilia took the race by 39 votes.

“We raised about $7,000 in my first election, then the guy that I beat decided he was going to run again, I raised a similar amount. His support was exclusively from PACs and I could not be more proud.”

Extending the network and asking people to give money is hard. For some, coupling the ‘ask’ with the support of a larger organization is what gets the job done – if you pick the right organization that is. South Dakota’s Cory Ann Ellis, an independent candidate for the District 7 House seat, has learned the money game very quickly.  The former college hall of fame athlete and veteran says she now approaches it like a business.

“Right now, they are investing in their representation. I want to go and fight for them, and this is an investment to get me there. And that makes it easier to ask, but it’s still hard. I think what made it easier was that first go. People say, “How can I help?” and I began with “Here are the ways you can help, and remember we always need money.”

Female candidates, as a whole, tend to receive the majority of their funding through individual donations. Ellis has decided to team up with Unite America, an organization that backs and supports competitive independent candidates to gain additional financial support.

“It’s empowering to know that there are organizations and other people who see what you are doing and believe in it and are willing to put their endorsements and money and well wishes behind it.”

She is now operating well above her base goal of $7,500.

Endorsements, money and well wishes from supporters are all a candidate needs to survive and continue into the next round. Our female independents may not be in line to receive vast war chests of campaign cash, as are the ladies in red and blue, but their ingenuity is setting the preconditions for voters in future election cycles to say more with greater regularity, “Oh that’s right! I heard about that candidate!” This may very well steadily create a wave.  The hard part will be explaining to people why we don’t want to give our wave a color.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Pink Wave vs Independents

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us