Skip to content
Subscribe

Rand Paul Back on the Filibuster: Federal Reserve, You're Up

Rand Paul Back on the Filibuster: Federal Reserve, You're Up
Published:

Update 1/6/2014 3:15 PM PT: Final vote on Janet Yellen's confirmation: 56 Yes to 26 No

Update 1/6/2014 3:00 PM PT: The vote to confirm Janet Yellen as the new chair of the Federal Reserve began at approximately 2:30. The vote has reached a simple majority. Final vote to come.

Update 1/6/2014 2:15 PM PT: Rand Paul's Facebook page announced that his flight to DC was delayed. He will not be in chamber for the vote. On Monday, the Senate is expected to confirm the

nomination of Janet Yellen to be the new chair of the Federal Reserve. However, the vote will not come without resistance. U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) may still filibuster the nomination even after the Senate changed the rules to allow a simple majority to not only push through executive and judicial nominations, but to end debate on these matters. Essentially, the 'nuclear option' creates a filibuster-proof Senate for the majority party without needing 60 members.

In the latter months of 2013, Rand Paul wrote a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) promising to filibuster Yellen's confirmation until he agrees to take up his bill to audit the Federal Reserve. Paul is carrying the torch on the issue now that his father, former congressman Ron Paul, is not in office anymore. He introduced an "Audit the Fed" bill in 2013, but even though it has 27-cosponsors -- including a mixture of Republicans and Democrats -- it has not been considered by the Senate.

As many will remember, Paul received support from people of all corners of the political landscape during a 13-hour filibuster to stall the nomination of John Brennan to the CIA in order to bring attention to the issue of predator drone use both abroad and at home. Nationwide surveys suggest that he would receive overwhelming support for this cause as well.

What makes the debate over auditing the fed so curious is that the person blocking its progression, Harry Reid, once proclaimed himself to be the biggest advocate of auditing the fed. In a well-traveled video from 1995, Reid complained that the issue was not being taken seriously in Congress. In fact, as late as 2010, Reid supported auditing the fed, but once he became majority leader, his position suddenly changed. While it is considered unlikely Democratic co-sponsors will stand with Rand, a filibuster to audit the Fed may have a better chance than any other filibuster under the new rules.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXOsZ7Ad7dM

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Rand Paul Back on the Filibuster: Federal Reserve, You're Up

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us