Skip to content
Subscribe

Rep. Maxine Waters: "The Tea Party can go straight to hell."

Rep. Maxine Waters: "The Tea Party can go straight to hell."
Published:

After weeks of heated rhetoric and accusations directed toward the Tea Party movement in the days leading up to the debt ceiling agreement and afterward, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) stirred up the war of words again in California this weekend by saying: "the Tea Party can go straight to hell."

The Democratic Congresswoman-- who is still battling House ethics violation charges in an ongoing investigation-- was addressing a townhall audience in Inglewood, California this Satuday, and the crowd burst into vigorous applause, giving Waters a standing ovation when she said:

"This is a tough game. You can't be intimidated. You can't be frightened. And as far as I'm concerned -- the Tea Party can go straight to hell."

Most media reports of the incident have omitted what she said after the applause subsided. Waters added:

"And-- and-- I intend to help them get there."

You can view the full video of Maxine Waters' remarks, including that last part, at CBS News.

The unhelpful insult-- telling Tea Party members that they can go straight to hell-- is bad enough in light of many Democratic leaders' calls for civility and a post-partisan era in American politics. But mere months after the shooting spree that left Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) critically wounded and others dead, those final words: "I intend to help them get there," could be interpreted as chillingly and insensitively unfunny.

As I meticulously detailed here at CAIVN this January, many bloggers and commentators, even in the mainstream media, blamed Republican and conservative rhetoric for the Giffords shooting in Arizona. Had Maxine Waters' recent words been uttered by a Tea Party Republican, how else would these same commentators interpret them, but as a death threat or an incitement to violence?

This would appear to be merely the latest in a deafening crescendo of ill-tempered insults and scurrilous accusations from ranking Democrats and their sympathizers in the media toward members of the Tea Party movement. During the debt ceiling debate-- a controversy over fiscal policy-- Tea Party supporters were called everything from "hostage-takers" to "terrorists," and accused of deliberately trying to destroy the United States economy.

Americans, whether they agree with the Tea Party's political platform or not, should recognize just how serious the recent wave of anti-Tea Party rhetoric is. The public policy debate in America has reached a fevered pitch of violent rhetoric and seething hatefulness. Political leaders and the voting populace who empowers them should speak with one voice to unequivocally disavow this kind of rhetoric.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Rep. Maxine Waters: "The Tea Party can go straight to hell."

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us