Skip to content
Subscribe

U.S. Collects 100% of Conversations in At Least 5 Countries

U.S. Collects 100% of Conversations in At Least 5 Countries
Published:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCSzTu2T15E

RT America recently picked up a Washington Post story detailing an NSA program called MYSTIC, which can store 100 percent of a nation's phone conversations. There is no indication from the story that the program is being conducted in the United States, but in countries where there is a national security interest.

"A senior manager for the program compares it to a time machine — one that can replay the voices from any call without requiring that a person be identified in advance for surveillance," WaPo reports.

Upon request of U.S. officials, the story does not explicitly list any countries the NSA is targeting, but WaPo does later report that leaks and other information gathered indicates that at least 5 countries are currently targets of MYSTIC and the U.S. is considering more targets.

The MYSTIC program, along with its retrospective retrieval tool (RETRO), reached full capacity with its first target nation in 2011. Collecting "every single" conversation and storing them for a month, the program has the ability to reach back and “retrieve audio of interest that was not tasked at the time of the original call.”

While analysts only listen to a fraction of one percent of these calls, millions of audio clips are sent for processing and long-term storage every month.While all reports indicate that this program is only being used abroad, it has many privacy advocates at home concerned. After all, Americans use the same devices and networks as people around the world; so, what is to stop the NSA from domestic use of MYSTIC and RETRO?

“It’s important to have institutional protections so that advanced capabilities used overseas don’t get turned against our democracy at home,” said Peter Swire, a member of the president's review group.

That sounds all well and good, but the lingering question for many is if such institutional protections exist and if they do, who is going to watch the watchmen?

Many lawmakers have been quick to defend the NSA because they say their mission is in the best interest of national security, but there seem to be plenty of congressional leaders and U.S. officials who simply are not too concerned with oversight. We have the oversight measures in place which can be effective, but as Edward Snowden explained in his South by Southwest (SXSW) appearance, the overseers don't seem to want to do their job.

It is not paranoia or hysteria to consider the possibility that in the name of national security the NSA would use MYSTIC to target Americans, further trampling on the constitutionally-protected rights of our citizens while Congress silently sits back and blindly nods their head because it is all for the "greater good."

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

U.S. Collects 100% of Conversations in At Least 5 Countries

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us